Bridging Misunderstandings: The Art of Mediation in the Shadow of the Past

Blog post description.

9/16/20234 min read

black metal frame in grayscale photography
black metal frame in grayscale photography

In the Filipino adage, “madaming namamatay sa maling akala”—translated as “many lives are lost to wrong assumptions”—we find a timeless truth that resonates far beyond daily life. In the workplace, where collaboration, trust, and productivity are essential, the danger of wrong assumptions can derail relationships and even entire organizations. Actor Henry Winkler once said, “Assumptions are the termites of relationships.” Like termites, assumptions eat away silently, weakening the structure until it collapses.

Mediation, conflict management, and executive coaching provide leaders and teams with tools to address these destructive cycles. Through open dialogue, skilled facilitation, and values-based frameworks, it becomes possible to move from the shadow of the past toward renewed collaboration and trust.

The Weight of Past Misunderstandings

Every workplace carries history. Teams remember who missed a deadline, who was unprepared in a meeting, or who failed to deliver on a commitment. These experiences leave imprints that shape how colleagues view one another.

Consider a team that once failed to meet a critical project deadline. Months later, even as new projects emerge, the shadow of that failure lingers. The manager may interpret a simple delay in email responses as negligence. Team members may view constructive criticism as blame. These are not objective assessments... they are filtered through the memory of past disappointments.

This cycle of interpretation has serious consequences:

  • Trust is eroded: Past failures define current perceptions.

  • Collaboration suffers: Individuals work defensively rather than openly.

  • Conflict escalates: Small issues become magnified under the weight of history.

  • Leadership impact declines: Executives lose credibility when they cannot resolve tensions.

The cost is not merely emotional. Misunderstandings rooted in assumptions affect productivity, innovation, and organizational culture.

Why Misinterpretations Persist

Misinterpretations thrive because of three psychological tendencies:

  1. Confirmation Bias – We notice only the evidence that supports our negative beliefs about others.

  2. Attribution Error – We blame others’ behavior on character flaws rather than circumstances.

  3. Emotional Residue – Past conflicts leave unresolved emotions, influencing our reactions even in unrelated situations.

In the context of workplace conflict management, these tendencies are like fuel to the fire. Without intervention, they create a self-perpetuating cycle of mistrust.

Mediation: A Neutral Bridge in the Workplace

Mediation breaks this cycle by introducing a neutral third party who can shift the conversation from judgment to understanding. In Philippine mediation practice, rooted in Republic Act 9285 and expanded through values-based training—mediators are trained to listen beyond words.

The Mediator’s Role
  • Neutral Facilitator – The mediator does not take sides but creates balance.

  • Active Listener – They reflect back not only what is said but also what is implied.

  • Reframer – They turn accusatory statements into constructive dialogue.

  • Bridge Builder – They guide parties from the past to future-focused problem solving.

For example, in a workplace mediation involving two department heads, the mediator may acknowledge the history of tension while redirecting focus to shared organizational goals. This acknowledgment prevents parties from feeling ignored but also avoids allowing the past to dictate the outcome.

Beyond Mediation: The Role of Executive Coaching

While mediation resolves immediate disputes, executive coaching strengthens leaders’ ability to prevent conflicts from escalating. Coaching helps executives recognize how their assumptions, biases, and communication styles influence team dynamics.

Through coaching, leaders learn:

  • Self-awareness tools to identify personal biases.

  • Communication strategies to deliver feedback without triggering defensiveness.

  • Conflict management techniques to address issues early.

  • Empathy and perspective-taking to rebuild trust.

When mediation and executive coaching are combined, organizations benefit from both immediate conflict resolution and long-term cultural transformation.

Practical Mediation and Conflict Management Strategies

To bridge misunderstandings, mediators and leaders can introduce practical steps that organizations can apply immediately.

  1. Ground Rules for Respectful Dialogue
    Establishing shared norms—such as no interruptions, listening without judgment, and speaking from personal experience sets the tone for safe conversations.

  2. Role Reversal Exercises
    Asking team members to argue from the opposite perspective encourages empathy and reduces entrenched assumptions.

  3. Structured Check-Ins
    Regularly scheduled conversations prevent small misunderstandings from festering into major disputes.

  4. Joint Problem-Solving
    Instead of assigning blame, focus on shared solutions. This turns energy away from the past and toward the future.

  5. Values-Based Reflection
    Invite participants to articulate which values (respect, trust, fairness, accountability) matter most to them in the workplace. This values-based mediation approach helps uncover what lies beneath surface-level positions.

Case Example: Mediation in Government Mediation Programs

In the Philippines, mediation is increasingly being applied in government and corporate settings. Consider the Department of Trade and Industry’s Consumer Protection programs. Thousands of complaints flow in each year, and without mediation, these could clog the legal system. Instead, mediation sessions allow consumers and businesses to resolve issues efficiently, with both sides heard and respected.

Similarly, in corporate conflict management, mediation is used when project teams clash. For example, in a technology company, engineers and marketers often disagree about timelines and product launches. Mediation allows both sides to voice frustrations, while the mediator steers the dialogue toward understanding the pressures each department faces.

The Connection Between Workplace Mediation and Organizational Culture

The impact of mediation goes far beyond resolving one dispute. When organizations embrace conflict management frameworks, they signal a commitment to:

  • Psychological safety – Employees feel safe expressing concerns.

  • Collaborative culture – Teams work toward shared solutions rather than silos.

  • Stronger leadership – Executives model humility by engaging in coaching and dialogue.

  • Employee engagement – Staff feel valued when their voices are heard.

This cultural shift is not only beneficial for relationships but also for business outcomes. Studies consistently show that organizations with strong conflict management systems experience higher retention, greater innovation, and stronger reputations.

Overcoming Resistance to Mediation

Despite its proven benefits, mediation often faces resistance. Some executives believe it is a sign of weakness to bring in a mediator. Others fear that acknowledging conflict will make it worse.

The opposite is true. Unaddressed conflict festers, while workplace mediation and coaching strengthen trust. Leaders who openly engage in mediation model the courage to face issues head-on.

From Assumptions to Understanding

Breaking free from the shadow of past misunderstandings requires courage and commitment. It involves:

  • Acknowledging the past without being bound by it.

  • Listening actively to others’ perspectives.

  • Reframing conflicts through values and shared goals.

  • Equipping leaders with executive coaching to prevent recurrence.

As the Filipino proverb reminds us, wrong assumptions can be fatal, not only to individuals but to relationships and organizations. By embracing mediation and conflict management, leaders can ensure that wrong assumptions do not define the future.

Conclusion: The Future of Mediation in the Workplace

The journey from misunderstanding to mutual respect is rarely straightforward. It requires patience, openness, and structured intervention. But the rewards (a collaborative, innovative, and harmonious workplace) are worth the effort.

As Philippine mediation practices continue to evolve, and as more organizations integrate executive coaching and conflict management frameworks, the future looks promising. Workplaces will increasingly become environments where past grievances no longer define present realities.

To borrow an anonymous reflection:
“Assumptions are unopened windows that foolish birds fly into, and their broken bodies are evidence gathered too late.”

Mediation opens those windows - inviting light, clarity, and fresh air into the workplace.